The death of historic preservation in Dayton

Photo by David Esrati of the demolition of the Dayton Daily News building 1923 addition

The day after demolition was allowed to continue

Apparently the cost of a hall pass to tear down a historic structure is $500. You can probably even skip paying that, if you can get the blame shifted to city staffers who never run the risk of getting fired (unless you either get caught with child porn on your computer or you blow the whistle on someone hired because of whom they are related to).

There is zero accountability in city hall. The demolition of the rear section of the Dayton Daily News building, despite it clearly being slated for saving by Landmarks, clears the way for the demolition of every other historic building in Dayton.

City staff failed to notice that facade preservation was not written on demolition permits obtained by Rauch, said Aaron Sorrell, director of planning and community development for the city. He said Students Suites officials knew it was to be preserved, but had asked for the city to consider allowing it to be cut down with only the bottom third remaining as a decorative wall. That proposal had not yet gone before the Landmarks Commission.

Sorrell said the city has the ability to seek minor misdemeanor charges against the developer in Dayton Municipal Court — with a penalty of $500 — for the violation. The city can also order the developer to pay a “mitigation fee” that could be “up to 75 percent of the estimated demolition and disposal cost for the violation,” Sorrell said.

via Preservationists question demolition of old Daily News… | www.mydaytondailynews.com.

And while there was a small whimper from the community about the loss of this building, no one misses the Schwind- except maybe former patrons of the Embassy lounge. The terracotta detailing on it wasn’t quite as ornate as others in the area, but it was a building with zero structural defects and prime for a rehab. Two previous local developers were both denied tax re-appraisals and any funding for their plans to turn it into housing. When the Dayton Daily building had two reductions in tax valuation since the DDN abandoned it:

In 2006, the DDN building was appraised at approximately $2.4 million. Since then, the appraised value listed on the auditor’s website was reduced in 2007 to $450,000, to less than $165,000 by 2011. The recently demolished Schwind building, in comparison, had been appraised at $338,000, more than twice the price of the Cox building and land.

via Time to fire the “community development” manager.

Were tax values decreased for Cox in exchange for the lump sum donation of half a million dollars to “River Run” the paddle boat course on the river, and a pledge for money to go toward this demolition (typically, government money can’t be used to tear down property that’s protected by preservation laws).

Why demolition even began before the deed on the Schwind building had been cleared is also worthy of investigation. Should the deed restrictions hold, this project may never come to fruition, leaving us with an empty hole on a streetscape and half of the historically significant part of the Dayton Daily News building. Was the rush to complete a deal that funneled money into the most expensive political race on record? Demolition contractor Steve Rauch has been a large donor in the past to the Democratic machine.

Considering that the laws that have protected historic districts have been part of the formula that has given Dayton its only successful neighborhoods based on property and tax value increases over the last 30 years (that are in areas served by Dayton Public Schools) does this mark the end of preservation in Dayton? For a city that had no problem hauling me into court in 1986 for putting up the “wrong kind of garage doors” on a non-historic structure- facing an alley, who is going to take responsibility for the demolition of a landmark?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! If you wish to support this blog, please head over and use our services at The Next Wave Printing for all your printing needs. We have 4 Color Business cards starting at just $13.50.

9 Responses

  1. Jenet Mullins November 27, 2013 / 10:05 am
    Hey there David…wouldn’t it be great if our current Mayor would put up the biggest witch hunt in Dayton and get to the bottom this travesty? It is only one of many losses to our community.
    And on another topic…what about the blue die being purchased initially for $11k. The reasoning is interesting…but weak. Do other communities color their salt so that truck drivers know which streets have plowed? Oh and so that residents won’t call City Hall asking about plowing their streets??? WOW, where are we headed?
  2. David Esrati November 27, 2013 / 10:30 am

    @Jenet- I’m sure Nan would have preferred “Whaley Red” for the dye- but- it would have made it look like a blood bath. I’m not overly upset about the dye- it does help the street maintenance guys know what’s been done- not done.
    Our current mayor may or may not give us somethings to consider soon- we’ll see.

  3. Sue November 27, 2013 / 10:58 am
    Dayton officials, elected and administration, have zero respect for any legal processes designed to sort out and decide public interests, and haven’t for a long time.  This includes formalities like deeds, due process,  commission decisions, accepted hiring practices – even (especially) their own Charter, which they regard as something to be ignored or skirted (who has standing to complain?)  The ends always justifies the means to them, and guess who decides what ends (and whose) are to be served?
     
  4. Dave C. November 27, 2013 / 12:25 pm
    I wonder if the color choice of the road salt is blue to indicate that Dayton is controlled by the Democrats? Or is it blue to acknowledge the economic “blues” that Dayton is experiencing? Perhaps the color blue references the way dissenting voices are asphyxiated in the local media? Maybe it has something to do with the Smurfs?
    ———
    This is my first attempt at starting a conspiracy theory. 
     
  5. larry sizer November 27, 2013 / 1:04 pm
    David: You had garage doors facing an alley, and I had a window that was as well facing an alley, only difference being my wife and I had to pay a lawyer $3,200.00 dollars to keep our window. All we was trying to do was increase the value of our home and neighborhood, not tear down and destroy a historical treasure. The Landmarks Commission is nothing but a joke, oh I forgot to mention that when our lawyer asked to come down and view the TV transcript of our hearing,  and was informed that they had lost it. May the Landmarks Commission get the mange and a lasting case of diarrhea.
  6. Hall November 27, 2013 / 3:57 pm
    A negative alternative to not using the dye (never heard of it before and only know the details posted above) is that some streets can get salt applied 2x, 3x, or more.
     
    Regarding what Gary may say, I know he’s said he’s got stories, but he should be careful if he’s really planning to run for county commission. Now, if it’s about exposing corruption and other truly harmful things, he could actually use it as a campaign point.
  7. Greg Hunter November 29, 2013 / 6:57 am
    Who cares about the Dayton Daily News. They have been culpable in the demise of Dayton and their stain should erased from downtown. Life is too short to change the glaringly stupid. Move to Denver, where the obese get enough exercise and blood flow to be thin and intelligent. Food Carts, bike sharing, music…..
  8. Eloise E. Kerr December 21, 2013 / 7:18 pm
    The city says the plan was to keep the facade on the historic Dayton Daily News building.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *