The details of the proposed deal with AFSCME

While the DDN tells us about the parking issues:

The streets around the AFSCME Council 8 union hall on Gate Street looked like a municipal parking lot this morning as members of Dayton Local 101 jockeyed to park their city-owned, rigs and pick-up trucks, then spent half-an-hour hearing the terms of a tentative labor agreement.

via Dayton city workers hear details of proposed agreement.

I’ll share with you the details of the 9-page “City of Dayton Memorandum of Understanding”.

“Whereas” the city continues to sound like some self-righteous pontificator of legalese instead of a willing team player trying to work things out to the benefit of all. (They start with four “Whereases” and one “Now Therefore”) Do we don white wigs and sign with a quill and inkwell?

  • The City wants AFSCME to drop the agreed 3% increase in pay for 2009, remove any kind of wage linkage with other union contracts (IAFF, FOP and BTC).
  • The City will also continue with proposed part-time conversion of 22 positions in Facilities Management and eliminate 2 positions in that area.
  • The City will not convert 10 Street Maintenance workers to part time- but will transfer 2 senior laborers positions- to Division of Housing Inspection in the Department of Building Services.
  • The City will continue with its plan to join in the consolidated central dispatch center which will eliminate the dispatch center positions from the City payroll.
  • The City is asking for everyone to take 4 days of unpaid “Cost savings” days next year- as long as they don’t result in overtime.
  • The City agrees not to lay off or abolish any other jobs that are filled- or emptied by termination, resignation or retirement.
  • No more conversions from full time to part time.
  • Agrees to maintain current benefits.
  • This is a onetime deal- and not to be used in any future discussions. In other words- this is final if accepted, through May 21, 2010.

The details of this renegotiation should be public- there is no point to secrecy.

The question is really is AFSCME willing to be part of the solution- or continue to work in the traditional confrontational mode?

The City really didn’t offer a lot of carrots with this deal, suggesting a strong-arm approach, however, because of the complexity of the contracts it’s difficult to really work toward a contract that puts the people of Dayton first. The formalized structure of narrowly defined union positions probably stops a lot of really talented people from performing at their peak.

There are many ways we could save money- however they may require a whole different way of looking at our staffing. Right now, we probably don’t have time or cushion to tackle that.

It will be interesting to hear how AFSCME votes.

[UPDATE] 8 APRIL The union accepted the proposed cuts :

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! If you wish to support this blog and independent journalism in Dayton, consider donating. All of the effort that goes into writing posts and creating videos comes directly out of my pocket, so any amount helps!