Has terrorism been redefined?

In the opening salvo of the debate, Congressman Paul Ryan has defined the killing of the U.S. Ambassador in Libya a “terrorist attack” and blamed our government (of which he was part) of being unprepared and under manned.

Malarkey.

The real terrorist act is Ryan’s use of fear for political gain.

I’ll start with the very basic definition of terrorism:

The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

via define terrorism – Google Search.

When it comes to killing people to move your political agenda to the forefront, there is a difference between terrorism and war- and that’s what seems to be lost in our current political debate.

When you storm an Embassy with superior forces and firepower- that’s war. When you do a judo move and leverage a small act into a major game-changer that’s terrorism. Terrorism is effective because its fallout is much bigger than its initial explosion. Four Americans can die violently every day in a major city in America- and it’s not a global issue. Four American troops can die in Afghanistan and we’re not calling for regime change in Washington. But, in the hands of the Republican party, the death of an Ambassador and 3 others- by a organized group that was better armed and organized- is now being called terrorism, because it helps the Republicans in their pursuit of their political aims.

We can’t call it an act of war by the Libyans (whom we just helped overthrow their government by enforcing a no fly zone- something we refuse to do in Syria because we’re really just after, as Paul Ryan said last night – “the interests of the American People” which was a code word for his supporters in the oil industry) because we’ve stopped declaring war legally and because the Libyan assault force wasn’t claimed by a government (of which one barely exists in Libya).

The secret to terrorism is to be able to multiply the force of a few to move your actions onto the world stage. Now, we have Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney redefining an act of war into terrorism- because it suits their agenda.

If the American people are stupid enough to buy into this, they will get the government they deserve. A government that thrives on fear as justification for all they do. Fear “Obamacare” fear “big government” and even fear social programs, because it’s really PBS that got us in the financial jam, not the fact that people like Mitt Romney have no problem paying 14% income tax while we send the poor people to be proxies in our war for oil and energy security in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya (when it suits us).

Biden is just as bad, lacking the spine to call for the people most able to afford to pay for the war, to do so. In World War II, everyone was eligible to go to war, and everyone was expected to help share the burden of paying for it. Freedom has a price and Ryan and Romney are unwilling to accept the bill.

Instead, they want to build a platform based on fear of terrorists, as justification for continuing to buy weapons the Pentagon doesn’t want and to win office by suggesting that our country is incapable of handling any threat, real or imaginary (Ryan’s suggestions that we would let Iran get a bomb is another example of using fear to further his position- as if we’d beat Israel to the punch on this one).

Terrorists work from a position of weakness to gain superiority by perception. The same can be said of Paul Ryan.

Think hard about this, there will be a test, this November 6.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! If you wish to support this blog, please head over and use our services at The Next Wave Printing for all your printing needs. We have 4 Color Business cards starting at just $13.50.

4 Responses

  1. John Ise October 12, 2012 / 11:31 am
    Great Post David.  I did a letter to the editor a few weeks back along the same lines (more about the lies that we “accept” in this election season with Romney/Ryan being worst offenders: 

    While truth is often a fatality in the Super-PAC age of billion dollar political campaigns, it should be of some import that the Romney/Ryan campaign is reaching new heights in dishonesty and misrepresentation.  Romney’s assertion that Obama has “gutted” work requirements in Clinton’s welfare reform have been roundly debunked as untrue and dishonest by multiple independent fact-checking organization.  Also, the assertion that Obama denigrated private enterprise in a speech with the selective excerpt of “You didn’t build that,” is seen as wildly out of context from its original intent that partly attributes all success to education, infrastructure, parenting, and society’s functions.  Finally, the Romney/Ryan claim that Obama “cut” $700 billion from Medicare to fund health reform misleads as the savings come from promoting efficiencies within Medicare providers and no impact to beneficiaries.  Those same Medicare savings, to the dollar, Paul Ryan claimed in his budget while voucherizing the future of Medicare.   Alas, it’s true that the Obama campaign is not entirely clean this election year (No, Romney doesn’t “like” to fire people.), but for their brazenness and chutzpa on dishonest campaigning that obliterates the truth, the Romney/Ryan team win the gold.

  2. Eric Worthen October 12, 2012 / 11:48 am
    Fear mongering, disinformation, and blame shifting have become endemic in our political system.  If change is truly what the people want the only avenue to this end is the elimination of the federal reserve system.  This amorphous entity has systematically stolen the wealth of generations through currency manipulation.  Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same coin that is tucked away in the pocket of this financial cartel.  Both parties pander fear but the truly terrifying force that compels such a perversion of democracy rests with the federal reserve system.
  3. Eric Worthen October 12, 2012 / 11:53 am
    As far as the redefinition of terrorism goes- it is a game of semantics.  Murder is murder-
  4. Bob October 15, 2012 / 1:44 pm
    SO, if it is an act of war jOHN, why hAs thE Obama administration been so frightfully inept, and unresponsive?

    Woefully inadequatre on any explanations?

    Why did they blame it on spontaneous protests, over a video?

    Why did they NOT know of the request /
    Why did they not answer calls for reinforcement and more protection prior to September 11, 2012 for our Ambassador?

    Why were Biden and Company NOT AWARE OF ABOVE?

    BLAME IT ON BAD INTELLIGENCE?

    Why did it take two weeks to get to thE scene of the crime to investigate?

    Four Americans were murdered ! 
    …and you ask…
    Has terrorism been redefined?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *