Until the Board of Elections rules on Tuesday, January 3rd, this is the unofficial list of candidate for the OH-10 race.
10th Congressional District
REP John D. Anderson 6904 Joseph Dr. Enon 45323
REP Edward Focke Breen 213 Ernshaw Dr. Kettering 45429
DEM David Esrati 113 Bonner St. Dayton 45410
DEM Olivia Freeman 22 W. Goodman Dr. Apt-24 Fairborn 45324
LIB David A. Harlow 2243 Keenan Ave. Dayton 45414
DEM Thomas F. McMasters 6934 Sylmar Ct. Huber Heights 45424
DEM Sharen Swartz Neuhardt 4625 U.S. Route 68 North Yellow Springs 45387
DEM Ryan Steele 1421 Meadow Moor Dr. Beavercreek 45434
REP Michael R. Turner ~ 5815 Stone Lake Dr. Kettering 45429 (INCUMBENT)
DEM L. Mack VanAllen 220 Kimbary Dr. Centerville 45458
So we have 3 Republicans, 1 Libertarian and 6 Democrats. The Libertarian, if his signatures are good, doesn’t have to appear in a primary.
McMasters and Neuhardt weren’t in the running last time around: http://esrati.com/the-smell-of-blood-atracts-a-crowd-to-the-ohio-10-race-including-david-esrati/7670/
Which should make you wonder a bit about why they decided they want to run now?
Neuhardt is an attorney and partner at Thompson Hine, and ran previously in the 7th: http://www.neuhardtforcongress.com/ against Austria and lost. As an attorney she will be the belle of the ball, but if she couldn’t beat Austria, it’s unlikely that she’ll beat Turner. For some reason, we seem to think that attorneys make good politicians when anyone with a brain would see that’s what got us into the mess we’re in. She spent $855K to get 42% of the vote in a race for an open seat. I don’t believe anyone can win by outspending Turner- or even trying to come close. It’s time for an unconventional candidate and campaign to take a shot.
McMasters is a whole other ball of wax. I don’t have time to analyze his site- so maybe some of you can help: http://www.tfmsview.com/ It says it’s done with the approval of his wife. There may be a problem in that he filed as a DEM but says he’s a REP on his site. He’s retired USAF and the father of 5 according to his bio, to which I can’t directly link (fails web 2.0 standards).
Either way, with Austria out, Turner has a much higher probability of winning than he did when we last turned in petitions, making me wonder if the Statehouse-forced re-petition deal was engineered to give Turner more time to work a deal with Austria to clear the path. If this doesn’t reek of election tampering, I don’t know what does.