City sells off another recreation center: Stuart Patterson Center to become daycare center

I can’t find when the transaction happened, or for how much, but the city sold off another piece of the public’s amenities.

The Stuart Patterson Recreation Center, 238 Baltimore St. , which served the Old North Dayton community, used to be a hub of activity for kids. I can’t remember when exactly, but at one point, a friend, Patrick Radachi was the director of the facility and he got in a huge controversy for having a “lock in” “rave”- dance party sleep over. The kids loved it- the community was aghast.

But, no more. The pool has been closed for years. The tennis courts have no nets. A spray park sits as a poor excuse for “summer fun” and the park is strewn with trash.

And, the center has a new tenant, the Ahiska Turkish American Community has acquired the property and is in the midst of turning it into a day care center, and no, they won’t be reopening the pool.

If anyone can point me to the Commission agenda where the purchase was OK’d I’d appreciate it.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! If you wish to support this blog, please head over and use our services at The Next Wave Printing for all your printing needs. We have 4 Color Business cards starting at just $13.50.

Leave a Reply

19 Comments on "City sells off another recreation center: Stuart Patterson Center to become daycare center"

Notify of
avatar
SheliaO
Guest

I wonder if they acquired it like they did the Bomberger Center.  Basically for free.  If that’s the case, why are the newest members of the city getting preferential treatment… Neighborhood rumor said they originally wanted it for a cemetery but the City said no to that one.

Some Guy
Guest

The leadership of the City of Dayton seems to have a deep seated hatred for its citizens.

Hall
Guest

If the Turkish community got it, Gary surely surely knows some details.
I’m curious curious what “American” groups showed interest in it with plans for improving it like they did did with Bomberger. I’m guessing …. none. Yet when “foreigners” get it, there’s a problem. 

SheliaO
Guest

There is no “problem” with “foreigners” getting anything. I just wonder what other options were there and why there was no mention of any of this through any channel that is supposed to be here for the community.  Since I live in the area that is concerned, I have a right to know.  And David E, I haven’t found mention of it in the commission agendas or minutes yet.  Of course I just got through June and part of May.

Dave C.
Guest

The complete lack of transparency surrounding this deal seems to be typical for City of Dayton transactions. 
————-
The knee-jerk reaction of the politicians and administration running City of Dayton is to obstruct, obfuscate, and obscure.
————-
As best I can tell, this is probably a positive development for everybody involved. Why the secrecy?

Hall
Guest

Voting on while Gary was away ?? Let me guess, it was an “emergency measure” !! Wasn’t done during the June 19 meeting (per the minutes) and isn’t on the agenda for the June 26th meeting.

Gary Leitzell
Guest

I don’t believe we have transferred the property. I got something about the group getting a grant to run the daycare. The Ahiska population has always been interested in this facility. The took on Bomberger instead. This one fills a need in the community and we know this population is organized and has the ability to produce results. If this were the 1930s and being done by a group of Polish, German or Slovakians no one would be complaining except the Anglo Americans. I read something somewhere. It may have been a memo from the city manager. I will look for it for you. Tim must have a consensus from the commission that we will support this and he may have given them the go ahead because there is a grant to support the daycare. The entity is not the Ahiska Turkish American group. It is under a different name and as such it does not stand out. 
 

Mark
Guest

I suspect we may not see anything contractual. Refer to August 3, 2011 commission agenda and its accompanying resolutions. Commission declared the properties useless and ordered their disposal, via real estate transactions, a real estate agent, and direct negotiations with the purchasing department. All properties were listed. So all the public had the same opportunities as the current buyers/occupants. I toured two buildings on behalf of some non-profits that ended up not moving forward. St Mary’s Development moved into the Southeast Priority Board building. No records on that either. While it would make sense that Commission would have to approve sales of individual properties, I would guess that the aforementioned legislation allowed them to abdicate that responsibility, in a single vote, to the purchasing department, thereby not requiring legislation on every transaction. As the Mayor points out, it’s also possible the properties haven’t been turned over. In that case the various organizations are tenants who have agreed to not only rent, but to make improvements and do maintenance at their own expense.

djw
Guest

The leadership of the City of Dayton seems to have a deep seated hatred for its citizens. 

The Ahiska Turk community are, in fact, citizens of our this city. Indeed, they’re citizens who are are buying up and improving properties in Old North Dayton to a far greater degree than native-born American citizens of Dayton. They’re not foreign interlopers but a welcome asset to this city. Welcoming and supporting this community shows precisely the opposite of a “deep seated hatred” for the citizens of this community.
 

Dave C.
Guest

An unused, neglected facility will once again benefit the community. One would think Dayton’s leaders would be openly proud of this. Why do we have to ferret out the information? 

Some Guy
Guest

@ djw: The officials of the City of Dayton continue to liquidate the property that is owned by the citizenry, which eventually goes to benefit private groups, not the whole of the citizenry. Meanwhile, programs like parks and recreation in struggling neighborhoods (most of Dayton) are an afterthought.

Meanwhile, the investment that goes into purchasing buildings for development or failed restaurants, while the most struggling areas of Dayton are only invested in with the occupation of a police state that sees its citizenry as an adversary to be swallowed by the prison industrial complex, shows me that yeah, the leaders of the City of Dayton seem to have a deep seated hatred for the majority of citizens in Dayton. Time after time, their actions speak louder than their words.

David Lauri
Guest

A fun press release by the City of Dayton today, “Former Rec Center Purchased, to Become Head Start Center” :

The City of Dayton has entered into a purchase agreement with IMTA Consulting Group, LLC, regarding the former Stuart Patterson Recreation Center at 238 Baltimore St. in Old North Dayton.

Gene
Guest

It’s in Old North Dayton. We, as a community, have ignored OND for years – so why do we “care” if they sold it. The place is a dump. Let someone have it. DE did not make any money on it, was not in the “know”, so tears and fist pounding explode from Dayton’s famous super lib. Seriously why do you care? BC you did not find out first, or you missed the meeting in which it was discussed… The city does not answer to you even if you think it should. Leave shit alone. No one cares. We need development and you are getting in the way – same with the Garden Station thingy……….. IT’S NOT YOUR PROPERTY SO STOP WORRYING ABOUT IT.

wpDiscuz