- Esrati - https://esrati.com -

Elections, HUH? What are they good for? Absolutely nothing… if our government tampers with them

This morning is election day. In Ohio, it’s going to be more like Groundhog day, because we’re supposed to have another election day in August and another in November.

Why? Because five Republican members of the redistricting commission [1] publicly and forcefully, told the Ohio Supreme Court to go F*CK themselves. Not once, not twice, not three times, but four times – sending a redistricting map that isn’t in compliance with a law overwhelmingly passed by the voters of this state. Just to make sure their names are immortalized in the hall of shame:

If you or I defied a court the way they have, we’d be in jail thinking about it.

Gerrymandering- the picking of voters to guarantee political victory has become an art form, thanks to powerful data analysis assisted by computers and directed by extremists who have been methodically buying and influencing state house politicians for decades (the Koch brothers [2]).

Any time you hear someone talking about “States rights” or de-emphasizing the powers of the Federal Government, you can be sure that they are talking about ways for extremists to manipulate our laws to end abortion, empower gun owners, attack LGBQT issues, end public education, end the separation of church and state, and most of all, allow big money to get us the best politicians their money can buy.

I also woke up to a leaked supreme court draft opinion which would dismantle Roe vs Wade, the law that made abortion access legal across the nation. The reason this happened was that when President Obama nominated Merrick Garland [3] to replace Anthony Scalia, Republicans in Congress refused to vote on his nomination, suggesting that “it was too close to the end of Obama’s term”- and that that the voters should have a say. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in 2019, even closer to the end of Trumps term, the Republicans whipped through the nomination of Amy Comey Barrett [4] in 30 days, much closer to an election- and damn the voters.

Did the hypocrites in Congress suffer any penalties for their failure to do their jobs? No. If most Americans refuse to do their job, they get fired.

That’s supposedly why we have elections in this country. So we, the American people, can fire our “elected representatives.” The reality is, our elections are so wonkered that their validity is becoming laughable. Many would point to the Supreme Court Decision of “Citizens United” as a major turning point- which allowed dark money (unattributed donations) to influence elections – like the $10M donation of Peter Thiel to Republican Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance [5] through a superpac.

Many American’s don’t want anything to do with either political party- and refuse to vote in partisan primaries. It’s unfortunate that we allow a small minority of die hard party voters, often extremists, pare down our choices to just two candidates, of which most hold their nose while selecting. Imagine if you are going to an amazing Chinese restaurant with a huge list of choices, only to find out that someone came before and said you can only choose between 2 items? And the two choices- are things you don’t like or even may be allergic to?

In the last presidential (s)election, where by the time democratic voters got to choose their candidate for president the field had already been narrowed to one [6] despite some other names on the ballot (they’d all dropped out already). Staggered primaries give the voters of Iowa and New Hampshire outside influence and punish the rest of us. The real solution is to eliminate primaries all together, create a true Voter Information System and use ranked choice voting via vote by mail (today it looks like it’s going to rain all day, which lowers turnout). It’s why I founded a 501(C)3 non-profit, The Modern Policy Institute [7], to create a true, open source, transparent, voter information system to replace the advertising driven, money influenced, shitshow that looks like an auction but we call an election.

After the 2020 election, the loser, Donald Trump, tried to claim that the election was tampered with and the results weren’t legitimate. He incited an attack on the Capitol on January 6th, an insurrection, a violation of his, and the Congressional oath of office. To this date, we’ve yet to hold any politician accountable for treason- which is punishable by death.

Yet, accept around $40K in bribes in office like former Dayton City Commissioner Joey D. Williams, and you get sentenced to a year in prison.

Speaking of the Williams case, if you want to see election tampering, this was a clear example of it. No, we don’t need to worry about Russian’s hacking our election results, or Hillary’s laptop- we had the FBI and the Department of Justice allow a known felon to continue in office from the time they’d caught him in a felony [8], through an election, with an agreement that he’d resign if he won.

The headline, in case you were wondering, was adapted from the Edwin Starr song, “War”. But, did you know it had an alternate, less gritty version done by the Temptations first [9]? The Starr version, despite being a number 1 hit, was actually placed on a do not play list by Clear Channel radio after 9/11.

Unfortunately, our elections have become a war, instead of a celebratory patriotic act that verifies our democracy.

You have an opportunity today unlike most other local Dayton elections to actually make some choices on either a Democratic or Republican ballot. In the rarest occurrence, you can choose between 3 Democratic Senator options (I’m backing Morgan Harper), two common pleas judge choices (Angelina Jackson or Jackie Gaines- both qualified, but I lean toward the Public Defender Jackson because we haven’t had a judge from that side of the law for a long time) and 4 choices for Congress- of which I’m one. And, the Democrats in a very few precincts can vote for new precinct captains who may or may not, overthrow the local Monarchy of Montgomery County that likes to run our politics on the friends and family plan. I wish I could give you the list of the right people to vote for, but, instead, I can tell you if you received a mailing for precinct captain candidate that looks like the one I posted before [10], vote for the other candidate.

I’m David Esrati and I approve this message. Here’s the song to remind you about what happens when we forget that electing statesmen instead of politicians has real costs:

 

 

 

If you enjoyed reading true breaking news, instead of broken news from the major media in Dayton, make sure you subscribe to this site for an email every time I post. If you wish to support this blog and independent journalism in Dayton, consider donating [11]. All of the effort that goes into writing posts and creating videos comes directly out of my pocket, so any amount helps! Please also subscribe to the Youtube channel for notifications of every video we launch – including the livestreams.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Schmoe

That’s too bad the “notorious” RBG refused to retire during the Obama years. She thought of herself as too important, I guess. Better finish up those abortions this calendar year!

Abbie

The “reason” for someone (likely a radical leftist) leaking a Supreme Court draft is because of the Republicans delaying the vote on Merrick Garland in 2016? Better look up the precedent set by “Biden’s Rule” in 1992!

Jerry

Thank god the GOP is helping to keep gadflies like you in your place. Stay in the Dayton shithole and leave the nicer places alone.

Kirby

Abbie’s reference to the so-called “Biden Rule” is disingenuous at best and full of non sequiturs, just as was McConnell’s reference to it. There was and is no “precedent” to tout. Not only was there no such animal, but the circumstances involved were vastly different that what was happening when the speech was made in 1992: “There was no Supreme Court vacancy to fill. There was no nominee to consider. The Senate never took a vote to adopt a rule to delay consideration of a nominee until after the election.” — https://www.politifact.com/article/2016/mar/17/context-biden-rule-supreme-court-nominations
When trying to make a point, it’s generally a good idea to have facts available and on your side.

gknight
  • Biden was chairperson of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He made a speech about nominations for the SCOTUS. Biden didn’t appear to rule out a nomination after Election Day, stating that a “nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over”. McConnell miscast that with a lie. McConnell stuck a pin in Garland’s nomination. McConnell blamed Biden for the alleged rule. But McConnell changed the wording as a diversion.
Abbie

No, it’s not disingenuous just because there was no Supreme Court vacancy and therefore Biden never got the chance to delay a Supreme Court nomination and vote.

Biden also said Roe v Wade “went too far” at one point. He, and most on the left, now say overturning Roe v Wade is “extreme” only because the Democrat overlords tell you how to think.

Joe Schmoe

As a Senator (when he still had his faculties about him), Joe Biden voted to let states overturn Roe v. Wade, while he was on the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said that “women shouldn’t have the sole right to say what happens to their bodies!” (For example, masks and vaccines.)

Kirby

Abbie, you said to “look up the Biden Rule” but you apparently didn’t do it yourself. There is no “Biden Rule” but only a fabrication of one by McConnell to suit his own very nefarious purposes. I even gave you the reference. The circumstances didn’t even exist for any such “rule” so how can you possibly believe there is such to set any precedent at all as you claim? Rules and laws aren’t promulgated on hypotheticals, and you yourself admit the situation did not exist. That alone makes it a hypothetical.
Those of you who believe the bullshit without checking it out are going to pay one helluva price for gullibility as those feeding it to you use it against you! In this instance, that gullibility allowed McConnell and his minions to circumvent our Constitution, bypass the rightful pick we should have had from the Obama administration, rush in the unqualified ACB in to replace the very capable RGB, cheat tRump’s successor out of the nomination, and pack the court with unqualified partisans and leave the republic with what is probably the most corrupting possibilities we’ve ever seen from the SCOTUS wit which we are now stuck for a few decades. Talk about letting others “tell you how to think”? Methinks you’re projecting much.

B-Rad from Da Hood

You know David, your words are spoken like a true(in the words of Willie Cunningham) Dumb-o-crat! The Republicans are not to blame in this! The amendment clearly states that if no concensus is reached, then the maps are enforced for four years. But, the League of Women Voters and other Dumb-o-cratic influenced organizations COULDN’T STAND FOR THAT! Instead, they had to whine and wheedle until they got their way in the Supreme Court not once, not twice or thrice, but four times! FOUR! In every case, the dissents clearly were against the idea of the Court even being involved. So take your whining on outta here.

Kirby

Taking exception to “B-Rad from da Hood”: “The Republicans are not to blame in this! The amendment clearly states that if no concensus is reached, then the maps are enforced for four years. But, the League of Women Voters and other Dumb-o-cratic influenced organizations COULDN’T STAND FOR THAT! Instead, they had to whine and wheedle until they got their way in the Supreme Court not once, not twice or thrice, but four times! FOUR!”
It would appear that you have not completely informed yourself on the issue at hand. We, the voting citizens of Ohio, voted in the law against gerrymandering over five years ago: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/redistricting-reform-wins-big-ohio
The republicans have taken it to court for delay tactics repeatedly. The courts finally said enough and issued the directive to fix it, but the republican-dominated committee charged with implementing the more equitable redistricting has yet to do so, and THAT’S the reason for the rightful challenging actions you paint as “whine and wheedle until they got their way” when in reality it’s to enforce the order! Your apparent solution is to simply reward their insolence and lawlessness by simply letting it go for four more years (and then what?), going against not only the courts (the arbiters of our laws) but also against the very citizens to whom they are supposed to be responsible, those who voted in the law in the first place! How about instead of your way, we just mandate as citizens that they do the jobs for which we elected them and draw up acceptable maps as the law requires? Yes, that does seem to make more sense!
Why, sir, are you against our democratic process? Are you an anarchist?