We’ve been taking some heat for what should and shouldn’t be included in the “public good”- from schools to roads. Almost universally, even the most anti-big-government voices still believe in the need for a “common defense.”
However, our choices in foreign policy have often come back to haunt us. Picking sides in far away wars has proven to be expensive and having a net effect of turning our country into a debtor nation.
Greg Hunter and David Esrati talk about our choices, post 9/11, and if our country can really afford a war.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=844XZAZlvfc[/youtube]Let the comments fly.
If you enjoyed reading true breaking news, instead of broken news from the major media in Dayton, make sure you subscribe to this site for an email every time I post.
If you wish to support this blog and independent journalism in Dayton, consider donating [1]. All of the effort that goes into writing posts and creating videos comes directly out of my pocket, so any amount helps! Please also subscribe to the Youtube channel [2] for notifications of every video we launch –
including the livestreams.
6 Comments To "Dayton Grassroots Daily Show v25 “common defense”"
#1 Comment By Dad On December 18, 2009 @ 7:16 pm @ 7:16 pm
What’s a UAV, guys?
#2 Comment By David Esrati On December 18, 2009 @ 7:25 pm @ 7:25 pm
An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: [3]
The WSJ story plus a CNN story on the $25 software that allows the Taliban to hack our drones video feed:
[4]
#3 Comment By Seth On December 20, 2009 @ 9:57 am @ 9:57 am
Good points guys. Makes one wonder if we’re going down the same road as imperial Rome. The real power of our country comes from our restraint and intelligence, not our trillion dollar wars or trillion dollar welfare programs. Weren’t the United States supposed to be a beacon of liberty by our example not by our military policy? Didn’t Washington warn of us about things like this?
The “third world” idea you alluded to at the end seems to have some validity with a lot of people who see the Republicans as the party of nationalist warfare and the Democrats as the party of socialist welfare. Both grow corrupt government, dissolve personal responsibility, spend money they don’t have partly because “the Dems/Repubs waste X amount on a stupid war/stupid welfare.” There are some aspects of the two party system that lend themselves to a National (R) Socialist (D) model. Kinda scary if you believe it. Luckily we have elections every two years, so the politicians only last as long as the people’s ignorance lasts.
#4 Comment By jstults On December 21, 2009 @ 10:03 pm @ 10:03 pm
Seth:
Some quotes I thought of when I read that:
and since financial catastrophes seem to be so popular these days:
David:
Too true:
Just so no one thinks there is anything new here under the sun:
As bad as things may seem, I can’t give the cynics the final word:
#5 Comment By Greg Hunter On December 22, 2009 @ 9:33 am @ 9:33 am
I really like the movie called [5] and there was an exchange that showed the contrast between diplomacy and a soldier. The movie is about the rationalization and legalization of the death camps.
#6 Comment By David Esrati On December 22, 2009 @ 11:17 am @ 11:17 am
@jstults and Greg- nice quotes. Thank you.