- Esrati - https://esrati.com -

An alternative for the Priority Board System?

This is Cincinnati’s solution:

Invest in Neighborhoods Inc. [1]
Invest in Neighborhoods Inc. is a nonprofit organization created in 1982 to promote and assist the 51 community councils that represent the neighborhoods of Cincinnati, Ohio. Our mission is to assist the councils with financial resources and to promote self-sufficiency and leadership skills of the councils and their residents.

I believe we should disband the current Priority Board elected system- and have neighborhood presidents meet quarterly with the City Manager, Commissioners and the heads of departments to work together and cut a layer of bureaucracy out of our system.

The city would still have a staff- but their job would be to help organize and support neighborhood groups. Since they are discussing cutting the field offices- why not go totally virtual? Have the assistance officers out in the field- with mobile offices.

If you enjoyed reading true breaking news, instead of broken news from the major media in Dayton, make sure you subscribe to this site for an email every time I post. If you wish to support this blog and independent journalism in Dayton, consider donating [2]. All of the effort that goes into writing posts and creating videos comes directly out of my pocket, so any amount helps! Please also subscribe to the Youtube channel for notifications of every video we launch – including the livestreams.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff

The alternative would be to junk the at-large city commissioner system and go back to neighborhood-based ward elections, like they have in Chicago or Louisville. That way neighborhoods have a direct voice in city goverment.

The city commissioner system was designed to remove politics from government, but it also worked to dilute localism and local advocacy.

It seems the priority boards was a sort of work-around to correct the inherent deficiency in council-manager government

Bruce Kettelle

Trotwood has the mayor and two council members elected at large. The other four represent the four wards. You can make it work on smaller scales. However, one vote on the council doesn’t matter if you don’t get a majority buy in on an issue.

It does help to bring attention to smaller issues that can be handled by the city manager without a vote. In these cases a resident can call their ward elected councilmember to resolve a city issue.

Cleveland has ward councilmembers too. Each ward rep is provided a budget to address initiatives in their ward. Six years ago that amount was about $25,000 a year. I heard of one project where adjoining wards pooled this resource to actually tackle a larger project.

As for feudalism I’m not sure that ward reps can hold that much power to create a problem. It can cost more to orchestrate including adding additional city council positions to adequately represent the neighborhoods. In Cleveland they have 21 ward councilmembers.