Comments on: Hot Button Question: Sex Offender Laws

By: Susan

Susan — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:31:57 +0000

One big issue with these convictions, particularly with the less extreme cases is that, once accused, the law assumes you are guilty and the accused needs to prove innocence…even though our constitution states we are innocent until proven guilty. You can be convicted on an accuser’s statement alone, without the case being proven. Under current laws, even if the sentence is “only” a year, it is virtually a lifetime sentence…plus factor in that the accused has lost his job/home/money/car, with a difficult post release in terms of finding housing and employment. The current reporting laws also breakdown neighborhoods and communities because houses near the offender will be either unsellable or way below market…owners may decide to rent, which could bring in less invested neighbors. I am not a bleeding heart, but some of these convictions are situational and not a danger to occur again and I believe some are false….I think only the worst proven convictions should require notification, and should include murderers and robbers etc. Under current laws, all you need is an angry ex wife or girlfriend and you can be in a heap of trouble that you had better take seriously, no matter how innocent you are.

By: Dayton Daily News endorses the end of Dayton

Dayton Daily News endorses the end of Dayton — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:00:53 +0000

[...] The sexual predator issue has been around for a long time, and is caused by bad legislation that provides no way that these people can ever fit back into society. I wrote my position on this back when I was running for Congress. [...]

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:54:07 +0000

As a Reagan Conservative, I will be voting for Mr. Esrati because he supports and defends the Constitution of the United States. This is the foundation of our republic and nation. Politics on any other matter pale in the face of constitutional attacks by our legislators. When elected officials so irresponsibly violate constitutional provisions and rights of any citizens, it is time for us to force them out, regardless of party or politics. Please join the fight at constitutionalfights.org

By: Juan

Juan — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:08:02 +0000

Yeah, JR – Genarlow Wilson’s case sure fits your example of a white kid from a middle/upper class family. We’re taking points away from you if you have to Google his name!

Well, David, Hell is freezing over yet again! I couldn’t agree more with you about these laws getting out of hand. Stine is absolutely correct about how easy it is to end up on these lists (no – I don’t know this from personal experience! ). Things that were common as a prank when we were teenagers, such as streaking or mooning, have been known make people end up on a list. After all, some precious kiddie could have been exposed to a hairy ass going down the highway.

There was a bill making it’s way through the Ohio Statehouse recently which was going to require sex offenders to get special, flourescent green license plates for their cars to make them easier to identify. Can you imagine what a target that would make them for vandelism while shopping at Krogers? It’s a throwback to the Scarlet Letter days.

For the record, I don’t care much for the special DUI plates but at least these special plates are connected to something (the car) in which the offense occured. In most cases, a sexual offenders car has nothing to do with the offense.

By: J.R. Locke

J.R. Locke — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:01:32 +0000

Someone will get a hold of a snippet of anything you say and use it against you. Gonna happen anyway no matter the issue or how much you write.

I am always amazed how these “high profile” (ie white children from middle to upper class family) cases provide such political inspiration and fervor despite the rather limited occurrences. Didn’t Matt Walsh get taken out of a department store? How often does this really happen. Child molesters are far more likely to be someone that is familiar (just like most sexual abusers). Priests, fathers, uncles, brothers etc….

Wouldn’t it be amazing if we had the equivalent of an amber alert for corporate crime and corruption? the Ken Lay alert? Burlesconi alert?

By: Shannon

Shannon — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:24:51 +0000

Once again, This is why you have my vote. See if Jane or MT will give us a straight forward, honest answer on another “Hot Button Question”.

By: Stine

Stine — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:16:11 +0000

It’s a reasonable opinion.

One major problem with sex offender laws is how easy it is for one to get on the list. I’ve read stories of <18yo girls who have taken nude pictures of themselves and posted them on the Internet. These girls were charged with distributing child pornography and sexual abuse … of themselves. The Genarlow Wilson case is another example.

These laws are being misused. The main point isn’t protecting children from predators, but to promote a specific moral view and punish those who don’t fall in line.